Three Kinds of Twitter Spam
Sunday, December 21st, 2008Email spam is pretty easy to identify: Someone sends you an unexpected, undesired solicitation. Twitter spam is a little less obvious. First of all, except for a Direct Message or @ reply, Twitter communications (”Tweets”) are not personally delivered, but placed into the stream. If you’re following dozens, hundreds or thousands of fellow Tweeters, it’s easy for even the most egregious Twitter Spammers to exist relatively unnoticed.
Why Am I Asking?
In the last couple of weeks I’ve seen particularly obvious spammers on Twitter. Not because they’re getting more common, necessarily, but because I’m now being followed by an extra hundred or two hundred twitterers each day. One of the reasons that happens is that I tend to follow people back. But while some use software that automatically follows back any account that follows them, I actually look at each profile and make a decision before doing so. Since I’m now looking at a hundred or more profiles each day, I’ve started seeing more of what I call Twitter Spammers.
What Feels Like Spam?
In short, it’s someone who consistently puts themselves and their business first. Don’t get me wrong. I’m a huge fan of business, and doing business, and understand completely that unless it’s replacing television viewing time, time spent on Twitter needs to have a concrete payback. But that’s not the same as failing to be real, human, interactive, and balanced. For me the Twitter Spammers have one thing in common – no interest in anyone else, and while “I know it when I see it”, there is room for disagreement or differing views.
On the other hand, there are some examples that I’m pretty sure everyone would agree are pretty clear. These are what I see as the 3 most extreme:
1. The Me, Me, Me, Me, Me Tweeter:
This is an active account. In fact, if anything, they tweet much more often than anyone could reasonably expect. If their account is to be believed, they added over a dozen new blog posts in less than one hour on a Sunday morning.
There’s not one single @ reply in their communications, no interaction, no semblance even of a real human being behind the business. It’s as if in real life they’d introduce themselves and repeat their blog address 10 times in a row, never answering a single other question, or bothering to even ask your name!
2. The Me (When I Bother to Do Anything) Tweeter
This is much like the first one, but much less frequent, a little more dispersed, and frankly, puzzling.
The only thing less clear than why someone would do this is why anyone would follow this account. Three tweets in four months. All three point to his own sites.
This user followed me today. I’m under no illusion that they actually have any interest in what I have to say. I only wonder how many of the other 1,000 people they’ve followed lately are going to blindly follow them back. I hope not many.
3. The I Might Be Playing a Joke Tweeter
This one might not actually be a Spammer, which is part of the reason why I eliminated any way to tell who they were.
Best case, they’re a slow starter, finding over 100 people to follow before making one statement of any kind. No weather report. No question. No opinion.
The other possibility, though, is they’re either playing some joke, or think there are more people willing to give them the benefit of the doubt when they’ve said nothing, than would follwo them back if they’d already gotten their 3 or 300 spam link Tweets in already.
What Have I Missed?
Those are the three types I can think of right now. Each of these actual examples came from profiles I’ve seen just tonight. I’m sure there are more.
What do you think? Am I being too harsh? What other spammer types have you seen? Do you think
Tags: Spam, Twitter, Twitter Spam



